Archive for July, 2005

Next up: Christians even more radical than San Francisco!!

Sunday, July 31st, 2005

As in 1534, remember?


Jan Matthijs and Johan Bokelson then instituted a reign of terror in Munster, ordering the socialisation of all property, and ordaining apostles of revolution to preach throughout Europe. The communist paradise of Munster attracted thousands of Anabaptists from throughout Germany and Holland. Matthijs was killed in one of the early battles with surrounding cities. Johan Bokelson took command and established a dictatorship in Munster. He then issued the order for holding everything in common, including wives.

No priests, no kings, no intermediaries between the individual and God. Individuals loving individuals and sharing all in common. Not bad. Good show, sixteenth-century radicals!

Anyway, for today’s revolution, wives in common are (generally speaking) out, as are violent overthrows of government. But — the good news — less violent overthrows of hate-filled fundamentalist regimes are in!

Brought to you by the same people who bought you Christian polyamory, you can find the equally politically conscious, less bloody version here at the blog Leaving Munster.

Launch BlogParty!! Tuesday, August 2, 2005, 8pm EST – head to http://www.crossleft.org

Sunday, July 31st, 2005

CrossLeft.org is launching its first interactive blog in a series

CrossLeft.org is a social networking site for progressive and moderates Christians. It was founded by Kety Esquivel, an activist for political hispanic issues and a former member of the Wes Clark campaign.

CrossLeft.org has three goals:

1) to put together a daily schedule of political, progressive, Christian bloggers with insightful commentary on the church in America

2) to build a single site where of progressive Christians can go for
- politically relevant news
- new online activity broadcast from Christian bloggers
- current discussions broadcast from other progressive Christian sites
- a single site linking to other progressive Christian networks

3) to build a networking site where churches and activist groups can announce their events, share strategies, post joblistings, and ask for advice.

Please join us for this exciting launch!

( You can help us by emailing information about this launch with 4-6 family members, church members, clergy, or fellow-activists who you think would be interested. )

Live! Streaming! Progressive Christianity!

Sunday, July 31st, 2005

So far we have only part of the stream working, but you can find live streaming entries from progressive Christian discussion boards here:Social Redemption - Discussion

SO — if any of you lurking through here have an rss-enabled blog, webring, newstream, or chatboard on progressive Christian issues, you should let me know! I’d love to add you. Stick the url in the comments section below, please.

Many thanks to FeedShake, and to Barb Dybwad for pointing us to it!

Dark Christianity - 95 Theses on the Religious Right

Saturday, July 30th, 2005

The blog Lieter Reports has a downloadable (.doc file) of 95 theses of the Religious Right written by philosopher Peter Ludlow. an excerpt:

The received view is that the conservative christians have taken over the Republican Party. I think the reverse happened. The right wing of the Republican Party has taken over the church.


Professor Ludlow invites readers to redistribute it as widely as they’d like.
They are modeled on the Wittenburg Church theses that Martin Luther nailed to its doors that began the Protestant movement. [click here to see them in full]

In the race to build a Christian RSS news site, the fundamentalists are kicking our ass

Saturday, July 30th, 2005

CrossMap Christian — the major news aggregator service
Born Again Christian RSS — a must-read!

Catholic Mass Pollution - Saturday, 02:00 AM -Scientists have now discovered idol worshippers are also damaging their physical health

and then dozens of others

Someone want to help me (and CrossLeft) get our act together?

A Progressive Christian: What do Progressive Christians Believe? Common Elements In Three Approaches (Updated)

Saturday, July 30th, 2005

Progressive Christianity is in the endless-mission-statement-writing phase of its existence. No Longer Silent has the admirable Phoenix Affirmations, and CrossLeft is in the process of writing its own. Another brilliant endeavor lately from a postmodern blogger on the Christian Left here:


The public stereotype of Christianity must change; what I value in Christianity is in danger of being lost, as Christianity, as portrayed on television, resurrects the heartless, rule-based purity culture that Jesus himself rejected.

Affirming Catholics challenge C of E on same-sex unions - news from ekklesia

Saturday, July 30th, 2005

Affirming Catholics challenge C of E on same-sex unions - news from ekklesia

Progressive Christian Blogger Network

Saturday, July 30th, 2005


Just joined! Progressive Christian Blogger Network |

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Plan for Dalai Lama lecture angers neuroscientists

Saturday, July 30th, 2005

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Plan for Dalai Lama lecture angers neuroscientists

Telegraph | News | Bachelor generation threatens China’s political stability

Friday, July 29th, 2005

Lack of sex makes men angry revolutionaries, historians find.

One young man in Beijing said yesterday: “People have different destinies. Maybe some people are doomed to be single, like insects which live just one day.”

Christian Soldiers descend on San Francisco

Friday, July 29th, 2005


“Ok everyone,” she said, and her little voice boomed in spite of her five-foot stature, “We’re going to show this city that God is our king and that the sin of this world and of this city will not stand against His Kingdom!” I cringed inside. Shanna was beginning to sound like an ill-tempered cheerleader whose team was losing.

CrossLeft has an RSS feed!

Friday, July 29th, 2005

Plug this baby into your RSS reader : CrossLeft - Organizing The Christian Left

Slobbering Bulldogs of the Right

Friday, July 29th, 2005

Maryland Christians for Justice and Peace has argued that there are more important things to talk about than the trimester at which abortion becomes illegal. More important things, like the ministry to the poor, the sick, and the outcast, which Christ preached, and which the fundamentalist Right has done a great job of destroying for American politics.

As reported by the AP, the fundamentalist Right has again responded by attacking progressive Christianity:


Carrie Gordon Earll, spokeswoman for Focus on the Family, a national political action group that rallied evangelical Christians during the last presidential campaign, said … if the organization is being formed “because they want to advocate the killing of pre-born children and approval of homosexual marriage, then they will meet us in the public arena because we oppose those things based on biblical values,” Gordon said. “If they are forming this group in the spirit of criticism, I suggest their motivations are misguided,” she said.

Okay, that’s really fair. Encouraging loving relationships, aid, and peace is the equivalent of murder, and the correct way to greet a new Christian group is to accuse them of “killing pre-born children”?

[sidenote - Maryland Christians for Justice and Peace isn’t weblive yet. anybody have more information on contacting them? drop us a line, leave a comment below…! cheers!]

Separation of Church and State — Why it’s not our issue

Friday, July 29th, 2005

A good, recent USA Today article highlights where church and state stands. Liberals often think of it as an enshrined, historical principle that we should go back to so that we can kick the evangelical voters’ groups off the air, stop the president from praying for mean things, and keep fundamentalism at bay in the schools.

But as a legal principle, it’s not clear that church and state is the fix.

Most Republicans of a slightly libertarian bent would also like to see funding to religious schools and organizations limited — in the same breath as they’d like to axe public highways, swimming pools, and lunch programs.

Fighting for social and political change on the basis of “church and state” tends to rile up post-40-yr-old liberals who remember gaining ground for pluralism behind the banner of “church and state” when school prayer went out decades ago. But these days it’s not liable to draw the loyalty of anyone except rabidly embattled atheists.

And why? Well, because Progressives in general are waking up to the fact that they have *always* had deep spiritual, religious, and humanitarian values in terms of a world view that insists that caring for people is more important than money or power.

If that’s a religious values (and often it is), all the more reason that religious communities of progressives should insist on their right to take part in public life, and should do so speaking from a religious point of view.

It’s not about foisting one’s beliefs on others. Progressive Christians are still loyal to the values of Cultural Pluralism explored by political philosophers earlier in the century, who insisted that the values of one group should never predominate to oppress the minority, just because the majority controls power in a democracy.

Progressive Christians find that their duty to protect minority religious, ethnic, political, and sexual groups echoes Christ’s ministry of loving and listening to the outcast.

- - - -

Link: USA Today article. We excerpt:

Cal Thomas is a conservative columnist. Bob Beckelis a liberal Democratic strategist. But as longtime friends, they can often find common ground on issues that lawmakers in Washington cannot.

Bob: A new book, Divided by God, by Noah Feldman, suggests a compromise in the church/state battle. Since religious values are so central to many Americans, Feldman thinks government and the courts should give more leeway to religious expression such as displaying the Ten Commandments and finding a reasonable way for students to pray in school if they wish. In exchange for this latitude, he would “insist on a stricter ban on state funding of religious institutions and activities.” I like that.

Cal: He has a point. Besides, God doesn’t need government or public funds to advance His agenda. Taking government money inevitably forces the recipient to compromise his beliefs. If religious people want their unadulterated faith taught, they should put their children in private schools or home school them. Yet religious students in public schools and in other institutions should have the freedom to express their faith, while respecting the faith, or non-faith, of others. That’s a balance that works in the public square and benefits everyone.
Bob: I think we agree. Government money for religious expression is a bad idea, can compromise faith initiatives and crosses the church/state line. That said, government and the courts need to revisit existing statutes and regulations that punish people of faith from expressing that faith in public. That, my friend, is a fair balance.

Link : Jeff Adams, Should Christians be Politically Engaged? in the Sierra Times — a beautiful essay on the same principle. We excerpt:

I’ll leave the judgment concerning Mr. Reed’s sincerity of faith up to God, and I concede that we all make mistakes and stumble and fall, no matter how strong our faith, but based on his actions over the last few years, I would say that at the very least Ralph Reed has been thoroughly seduced by the power and corruption of our political system. I wonder if he even realizes how far he has sunk in the quicksand of political games and corruption.

Christians, don’t let this happen to you. Yes, be politically engaged. Organize, or join an organization that advocates for the Christian worldview.

Interracial ministry and political imperative

Friday, July 29th, 2005

USA Today reports that Hispanics are becoming key presidential swing voters.

And alas, it seems that the Democratic party hasn’t been catching on — not to cultural trends, not to demographic trends, not to providing people with what they need.

Progressives, with their emphasis on cultural pluralism, can reach out where others have failed.

But their answer will be extremely different from Bush’s: motivated by the Gospel message of redemption, Progressives can offer responsible solutions to crime, Iraq, and economics, that don’t depend on wantonly punishing our citizens and mongering warfare across the globe.

(hey Kety Esquivel! are you out there? want to post some links?)